A report by Big Brother Watch, entitled ‘The Price of Privacy’, has raised questions about the cost effectiveness of surveillance across the UK. The report claims that ‘...CCTV does not have a significant deterrent effect on crime, and is not a substitute for police, yet it continues to be claimed-without evidence- that more CCTV improved public safety’.
The report is based on a survey conducted by Big Brother Watch sent to over 400 local authorities throughout the country. The results showed that, from 2007 to 2011, the cost of installing, operating and maintaining CCTV cameras came to £525 million; money which Big Brother Watch suggests could be more effectively spent employing 4,121 Police Constables or 5,894 Police Community Support Officers.
The report stated that ‘CCTV serves as a costly placebo for many local authorities, designed to appease neighbourhoods suffering from anti-social behaviour problems’, and compared to conventional policing it has no demonstrable success in reducing crime.
The report calls for ‘major changes’ to improve the regulation and evaluation of CCTV by local authorities. Big Brother Watch maintains cameras that haven’t helped solve a crime in three years should be switched off. The report suggests that councils should use crime data to decide where surveillance cameras ought to be positioned while using non-fixed camera to help tackle the root cause of the problem. However they highlighted that ‘this will only work if cameras are part of the police’s actions rather than being used instead of them’.
To read the full report click here.
Professor Martin Gill led a piece of research for the Home Office published in 2005, entitled ‘Assessing the Impact of CCTV’, which identified a number of limitations in the use of CCTV.